Github vs bitbucket reddit. Gitlab can't do this.

Github vs bitbucket reddit ) with focus on game projects. GitHub has just become a popular hosting solution for git, until recently. Bitbucket vs GitHub: UX Bitbucket is awful. GitHub is definitely faster, while on GitLab there’s a lot of clicking, waiting a couple seconds, clicking again, repeat. GitHub is a great option if you want to share your code. Additionally, Bitbucket has much of that functionality of GitHub which actually matters (i. To me it seems like it just works. I know people are telling to selfhost, but if you are a developer hosting your code on GitHub or GitLab is somewhat easier solution. If you need FedRAMP or SOC compliance, that cuts the list down a bit differentiator (forgot the details). Drone. io, a kanban system which works with Github issues, only works with Github. . Reddit's #1 spot for Pokémon GO™ discoveries and research. Put it on bitbucket. I think it's important to think about what kind of value Github would add to your team over Bitbucket and weigh that against the effort/learning curve required for your team to adapt to using a new platform. The social collaboration features don't seem up to par, nobody communicates through bitbucket like they do on github/lab, and there are no user profiles. What you ask for is very interesting. Issue tracker 4. You can have multiple projects. sydalmighty • BitBucket for closed source and GitHub for open source. our aim is to do a 1:1 conversion from Subversion to Git, introduce git into our workplace and then do optimizations afterwards. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. Well bitbucket is just one of Atlassian's products, while Github (the site) is Github (the company)'s core business. Will become obsolete soon, as the Obsidian Git plugin was also released for Mobile now. While i agree that there can be poor implementations of SSH, in this context (ssh vs ssl/tls for github), what you are saying makes no sense. Many many places are still locked into old school, centralized systems that make collaboration much harder than it is using Mercurial or Git Git was developed by Linus Torvalds and others, the most vocal proponent of meritocracy I know. Also don't be afraid of Microsoft. However the objective of the article is to do a comparison of the main features of three of the main CI/CD in the market. By the time bitbucket realized git was winning GitHublets developers host and review code, collaborate on projects, and track changes over time. This project comes bundled with a command line interface for manipulating your repos. Will further training be required for your team? How many days of development work will you potentially lose? What are the long term benefits? To understand GitHub, you need to learn what Git is. We already adapted our actual infrastructure running our product to be able to switch relatively easily between different providers. AppVeyor only works on Github and Bitbucket. My major pain All discussions related to Atlassian products such as Jira, Trello, Confluence, Bitbucket, etc. GitHub actions also got a large community behind it, would really recommend going towards that. Both Bitbucket and GitHub come with a plethora of extensions and third-party integrations for you to choose from. com. You can do a similar thing with Github Workflows, writing small workflows with specific triggers to perform specific actions Bitbucket/Github have PR rules which can require x successful builds (e. Git is a CLI-based source control tool manages your source code. Curious why you’re against it. I must say i'm loving Both Git and Mercurial have (ostensibly) adequate cross-repo bridges so you should be able to work with GitHub either way. But any source control is worlds better than no source control. I was comparing different Git servers (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket etc. Supporting Git is completely fine in itself. All in all, there is so much, that I Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. This means you don't need any special tools to do this. Of the three I liked GitHub the best but GitLab does have its strong points, especially the CI/CD pipelines. com into JIRA for this same functionality. Crypto I think it's a problem of ergonomics, there's a huge gap between bitbucket and github/gitlab in areas like code navigation, dark mode and page layout (lots of double scrollbars). what we don't want to do is to split the repository before Thanks, that looks promising. One final thought, Gitlab (and Bitbucket) organizes things in projects with defaults, permissions etc. Github, Azure DevOps would be perfect for GitHub vs Bitbucket: Wikis and Collaboration. If you are running your GIT commands in terminal, and ALSO running GIT commands in the GUI, thats likely what is causing your crash. I have an Android mobile and an Ubuntu Linux desktop. The ado board can connect to your git repo as well. We're used to the tools from Github. In order to facilitate that workflow, Github provides some interesting features: Assign pull requests to teammates Github and bitbucket both implement git source control. GitHub vs GitLab vs BitBucket . GitHub Enterprise. They wrap a pretty ui around it and typically include other non-git features. I played around with bitbuckets cicd it seemed okayish. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. When to Use Bitbucket: Small Teams and Startups: Free private repositories and good integration with team As someone who recently priced out GitHub vs Gitlab, the static code analysis and some other dependency management features are locked behind GitHub Advanced Security. I really dislike the way GitLab organizes the repos. Github and Bitbucket both allow for a 3rd build state, the idea something has built but has issues (bitbucket calls it unstable). Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now The pricing between the 2 is pretty similar between Gitlab Premium vs. It’s Reliable and Super-Fast: Several operations are desired locally on Sourcetree isn't one of them. GitLab vs. If I remember, it was roughly 5-minutes leak-to-breach. Bitbucket is great because it supports git and mercurial and you can create a private project for free. In addition to working with source code, both Bitbucket and GitHub serve as collaboration and knowledge sharing platforms. Also just recently a gitlab dev deleted the entire production database, and they lost like 6 hours of project data. So whether you're a fan of the cool and casual approach, the ambitious and organized approach, or the nerdy and reliable approach, there's a version control platform out there for you. I rather like Gitlab's CI system and was wondering how it compared to Bitbucket Pipeline's equivalent 5. The most important part is how do they handle storage (Git LFS) and I found out that Azure DevOps is the most generous option, because it does not charge for storage. BitBucket is fairly terrible from a UI perspective, but it is good to be able click 'Create branch' from within the JIRA issue,as well as track the progress. I used GitHub/ BitBucket at my old job and GitLab at my new job. PS: I'm offering Premium access for FREE until January 19th! Not considering Bitbucket or GitLab? I recently did a comparison for work between Bitbucket, GitLab, ADO and GitHub. Integrated CI/CD and automati Both Bitbucket and GitHub are powerful platforms for managing Git repositories, each with its unique strengths. GitLab tries to The most distinguishing factor between GitHub and Bitbucket is that GitHub focuses on public code while Bitbucket focuses on private code. It is possible with version control systems – software that allows documenting changes I've published an article comparing GitHub Actions vs Bitbucket Pipelines and GitLab CI/CD The only thing I miss about bitbucket is that the pull request renders in the jira issue along with its status, eg merged, open, closed. org and Github. io) is a self-hosted open source git service with code intelligence, customizable issue workflow, issue boards, service desk, built-in CI/CD, LDAP/Active Directory integration and OpenID based SSO. uk. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing While Bitbucket is not the "cool kid" like GitHub/Gitlab it is still in another dimension compared to the AWS landscape. Currently we are beween bitbucket or github. You aren't buying a car here, you can change the decision whenever you like for zero cost. Interface Can Be Confusing: Some people find Bitbucket harder to use compared to GitHub. No, really. Software development projects are based on teamwork. They're all solvable though, it's just a question of if you'd rather spend time dealing with these issues. Chances are, there’s using git submodules to share sub-vaults with certain friends and co using Termux with self made scripts to sync for git on mobile. First is that you definitely need to use LFS. Bitbucket is more flexible than GitHub. In order to facilitate that workflow, Github provides some interesting features: Assign pull requests to teammates Every clone of a git repo is a full copy of the repo that includes the full history. GitHub Codespaces has managed to bridge the gap left by Docker and other development tools by providing a smooth, browser-based (or desktop-based, if you prefer) ephemeral environment. With Codespaces, devs can quickly spin up a container on Let’s take a look at the differences between Github, Bitbucket, and Gitlab in this area. I've also used GitHub actions to run builds in GitHub using AWS CLI, and that worked okay too. Or host it yourself. I haven't had any problems integrating GitHub and AWS, either, using Codestar to kick off CodePipeline builds based on git activity. So they are really a suite of services with git source control being one of them. After our pipelines went down for a few days due to incompatibility with an OS security patch, we evaluated rebuilding Jenkins vs moving to GitHub Actions which our Enterprise account had recently added. Gitlab has moved in this direction but as with everything in Gitlab they've chosen to invent their own lingo I use Bitbucket and it seems fine. I've never been completely satisfied with Atlassian's stewardship but Bitbucket had always been okay if a bit of a laggard, and gratis private repositories is excellent. You could start in pipelines then move to GitHub actions later if they ever decide to kill pipelines. I'd choose it even if it cost more. Out of 7 companies I've worked in, 5 of them already used GitHub before I joined. com but will also continue to use Jira (Atlassian cloud) and I'm not sure how many features we will miss if we choose Github. If you decide that you don't like it, pull it off bitbucket and put it on GitLab. Core functionalities. com as our Git service. , not the social stuff), GitHub's popularity is almost entirely a matter of social dynamics. It's easy to get them confused. Difference between Github and Google drive So me and a couple of my classmates are in an independent app development course that's online and were told to use github as a method of storing files. Gitlab has is more expensive though and Github has more current innovation, but that innovation is more focused on AI/copilot/cloud features. That’s the only thing that can even begin to bring the pricing close together for Ultimate and Enterprise. Bitbucket (assume github is similar) has jira, wiki, issue tracker and other project related integrations as well. TL,DR: IMHO, if you're already using GitHub and have solutions for ticket/story tracking then ADO won't offer too much except consolidation unless you're working in Azure to begin with. In the early days, github supported git, while bitbucket bet on mercurial. 9M subscribers in the programming community. I had to fix merge conflicts while working with bitbucket, gitlab, gitea, gerrit and many more. Wercker is also Github and Bitbucket only. I’m thinking of switching to perforce as I’ve been using p4v at work for a little over a year and it’s been pretty great, especially with multiple users. Ado pipelines still have more to offer but GitHub actions are closing the gap. I always close out of sourcetree before using git in the terminal. Long long time user of gitlab and I couldn't agree more. Why Jira? Because I will be tracking more than Source Code going forward and want something more general than Gitlab's issue tracker. Now it seems like you would only choose BitBucket if it offers a particular feature I once had Atlassian tools on premise but the admin stuff takes too much time in the long run. 1. Performant, Hi, actually we have a fully automated, manageable GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Jira backup & Disaster Recovery software available as an on-premise solution - you can backup all or chosen repositories and metadata, assign your storage (on-prem or cloud) or use our cloud (included for free), set an automatic backup plan (fully customizable), add additional admins, use long-term Customer support: To be honest, both GitHub and Bitbucket’s help staff are excellent. I fear after the price hike they are going to start phasing out self hosted. When to use GitHub vs BitBucket. Explore: Docker vs Kubernetes. By understanding their differences, you can make an informed decision that best suits your development Bitbucket offers unlimited private repositories for free, while GitHub and GitLab offer limited private repositories for free. If you are deploying to Azure, DevOps brings some tight integrations in. BitBucket: What’s the difference? GitHub, GitLab, and BitBucket are the three most popular Git repository services, known for their version control, security, and supportive communities. I would say outside of GitHub being owned by Microsoft, ADO is probably the product where you could legitimately be Microsoft-averse and make a good point. I haven't investigated plugins for Gitlab or Github. GitHub has a vastly better UX and much more functionality. Oh, and new Git users always confuse Git with Github which annoys me to no end. Bitbucket can also import from Git, CodePlex, Google Code, SourceForge, and SVN. org to measure time between an AWS key being leaked to GitHub until it was attempted to access an AWS account. , and software that isn’t designed to restrict you in any way. Create a new, empty repo with the correct name on GitHub Clone the BitBucket repo to your local machine (or, if it's already cloned locally, run git pull to ensure your copy is up to date) . Fun Fact: GitHub runners operate in Azure. In Business, Economics, and Finance. PLastic has nicer Unity integration, but you get more free space if using Git and one of the common free hosted services (I'd recommend GitLab, but both Github and Bitbucket are good as well) With a team, definitely Plastic (now known as "Unity DevOps Version Control"), or Other option, would be to mount an EC2 instance in the AWS account and have Jenkins and Sonarqube running there and download the code from GitHub or GitLab, but this way, you need to pay another fee because this won't be open-souce. A community dedicated to all things web development: both front-end and back-end. GitHub is just there, though depending on how many actions you're triggering it can get a little pricey. Github is a proprietary product (formerly owned by a company also called "Github", but now owned by Microsoft) that offers the following set of features: Both Bitbucket and Azure DevOps have what we need but we can't decide which to use. It's a bit tricky to set up DevOps, because the whole Azure ecosystem is a beast. Copy the clone URL from the GitHub page for your new repo A GitHub Project is just a collection of issues (tickets) and a workflow. It is possible to use Git to sync an Obsidian vault between a mobile device and a computer without (1) resorting to a web-based hosting provider like Github as the middleman (should you want privacy), and (2) without worrying about setting up Git on the mobile device. What actually makes Bitbucket better than GitHub? 1. I do have both, but if I were to write some opensource software I'll most probably put it on GitHub as it is better known and you have people that will search only on GitHub and do not search on GitLab/BitBucket I've published an article comparing GitHub Actions vs Bitbucket Pipelines and GitLab CI/CD As of ~this year I formally advise against Bitbucket. That might not sound like an issue but when you spend several minutes per build extra just waiting this easily stacks up. The platform has a large community and offers plenty of tools to enhance developer efficiency: 1. This app allows you to track all your Pull Requests status from Github, Gitlab, Bitbucket and Bitbucket Server in one very simple-to-use menu bar app. Having a solution in GIT, you can move it easily to another repository. Jira), but realistically it's because there's no real difference between the two and it would be a hassle to move across our View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. Difference One of the big differences between git and most of the other version control systems is it generally keeps a local copy of the there are lots of different Git hosts to choose from, like GitLab and BitBucket, many smaller ones, and many private For years, SSH has been attacked mainly by brute force, as many accounts are still only secured with a simple password instead of a keyfile. I've been using a Github repo up until now but I can see they've released their own Unity Version Control, has anyone had experience with both? Is it worth switching to Unity's solution? I like the idea of something more tightly Git is an open-source project for creating and managing code repositories. It follows that github has more features that are better thought-out. GitHub has a large open-source community, but businesses and organizations mainly use I’ve helped a lot of small teams migrate from bitbucket to GitHub because it has more integrations. As Scott Chacon (author of ProGit) puts it,it's really not that huge a deal if your using Git or Mercurial; they're very similar--it's using a distributed version control system that's a huge deal. The biggest barriers to git are largely to do with art assets. u/bitbucket Hello, Choosing the right version control platform is crucial for effective project management and streamlined development processes. And git has a great and helpful community. GitHub and GitLab are very different animals. It’s the only one I’ve used so can’t compare to GitHub or GitLab. Development on Github is generally faster than on bitbucket. It tracks your changes (history), allows you to collaborate with others, and much, much more. Adopt Github in the cloud. And the site tends to be faster too. My team went from bitbucket to gitlab and we didn't look back. johnothecoder. Build Verification/Smoke Tests (merge request pipeline) are crucial in ensuring technical debt doesn't increase and objective consistent measurements of code are taken. So for us it's a question between Bitbucket. From issue tracking to project management tools, there are a variety of extensions and apps that can help extend the functionality and usefulness of your repository hosting platform. Code review and code management 3. I can’t find it, but I recall some security researcher used canarytokens. Wikis and other tools for collaboration, built right into the platforms, help teams work collaboratively on ideas that form part of the intellectual space of the code. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS. The build system will be different. The Silph Road is a grassroots network of trainers whose communities span the globe and hosts resources to help trainers learn about the game, find communities, and hold in View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. g. When Bitbucket dropped Mercurial support, we stayed because the code review tools for PRs in Bitbucket were better than Github's (at the time). For us it was not immediately worth it. Related Topics Programming comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment angelicosphosphoros Let’s take a look at the differences between Github, Bitbucket, and Gitlab in this area. Ended up going with github actions, and forced my boss to change our VCS to github (which also allowed us to move from mercurial to git, godsent). Smaller learning curve than fighting integrations. The pull request process in Github is designed with team-based projects in mind. All pipelines complete). FWIW, other perifery peripheral tools often only work with Github or Bitbucket. I switched my startup to full github with private repos (first we had git-over-ssh with git hooks, then git-over-ssh with free gitlab, then free gitlab and now finally paid github). This means software you are free to modify and distribute, such as applications licensed under the GNU General Public License, BSD license, MIT license, Apache license, etc. There is a fairly good chance that you will have the same issues with any application you use in this configuration. Travis only works with Github. Was incredibly easy to set up building+pushing to dockerhub, even using docker buildx for multiarch support, setting up self hosted runners was a bit of an issue though (only the buildx part, the github runner was a breeze) Not considering Bitbucket or GitLab? I recently did a comparison for work between Bitbucket, GitLab, ADO and GitHub. You might for example have a project for bugs and a project for features, or you might create a project for a release and delete it once the release is complete. You have keep git locally, or host it yourself easily (without all of the extra features of course). GitHub really is just source control, though it has a pretty big ecosystem of tools that integrate with it. If you are using JIRA, bitbucket has the tightest integration, but the others, including Azure, have integration too, so that might be enough. Github’s Pull Request Feature. Some use others but in my experience yes, GitHub is the standard for both public and private code, from startups to mature companies. This is git specific - gerrit is for code review (at least that is how I used it). Github has a different take on “structure” that takes a bit of time to get used to We are running Bitbucket, the git is ok but slow, but their pipeline solution is painfully slow compared to GitHub. Just stay away from GitHub. I wonder if they ever sell Gitlab Ultimate as the pricing is insane. If you're using Jira (and plan on continuing) Bitbucket has some nice built in integrations. Like I said at the start ADO is being superceded by GitHub and Microsoft is actively recommending GitHub over ADO. I have more experience in Azure DevOps from a previous job, however, it seems like overkill tbh. Extensions and Third-Party Integrations. Github requires that you generate and use a public/private key pair with an additional passphrase on OneDev (https://onedev. There are different The issue seems to be more git-workflow related then to gerrit. Although, I like how the boards, repo, and pipelines are all integrated in one place rather than having to use Jira/Trello for Bitbucket. I also think git is a great option since you don't need a host like the ones you mention here. Reply reply A community for sharing and promoting free/libre and open-source software (freedomware) on the Android platform. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment. Edit: FWIW, I have my (small) repo on github, chosen because github is shorter than bitbucket and thus faster to type. Edit: Looks like there are a couple of good Git add-ons for JIRA. Bitbucket also offers more integrations than its competitors, and its code Let’s compare the key differences of Bitbucket vs Github based on various factors such as UX navigation, collaborative code review capabilities, third-party collaborations, pricing, and much more. While GitHub comes with a lot of features and allows you to create your own workflows, Bitbucket arguably has more flexibility built-in. Just finished a move from Bitbucket to GitHub, although we are keeping Jenkins and not using actions. Pros and Cons of GitHub and Bitbucket Pros of GitHub. Any platform that gives you the tools you need already integrated as a service so you don't have to deal with 2 different pricing schemes, 2 different support process, having to worry about local backups and disaster recovery. Merge conflicts can be hard to solve yes, but that's not related to those tools in any way. Yet all our CI workflows are hardcoded for github. Also one more thing to keep in mind is that each major git service offers a GUI tool to manage Git. They were evil and a lot of the company is still stuck in the past, but they're open source and developer stuff is pretty nice. Problem #2 is what I hate most about github actions. Our engineering team started on Bitbucket but switched to Github when we noticed everyone complained about the UI/UX and how navigating their UI, searching anything, code syntax highlighting, commenting, and onboarding new engineers (generally, a lot more people are familiar with Github than BitBucket on day 1) was a huge pain in the ass. e. However, before we used github my colleagues and I used google drive as a method to store our code and images. I am currently on the research mission to decide what we are going to use. I've tried `act` but it's not working as well as one would hope. Bitbucket: Thanks for your comment. I participated in migrations for the other two (one from self hosted SVN to self hosted GitLab, and other from Bitbucket to GitHub) however, our subversion repository contains alot of binaries. Repository management and hosting 2. Gitlab can't do this. Bitbucket vs GitHub: Developer Adoption Developer adoption and community reach is one area where Bitbucket and GitHub have experienced diverging fortunes. GH Actions won by a landslide. Even though GitHub isn't nearly as feature rich currently. GitLab also offers private repositories, and at an even better deal than Bitbucket, so Bitbucket is no longer competitive in that area. So Git vs P4 do differ in fundamental ways but I'm going to skip all that to talk about what I think is more important here. We actually still mirror our code one way from gitlab to bitbucket, so we can also see the branches/commits in jira as well. Nobody wanted to rebuild Jenkins. Lacking the dominant position in open source that GitHub Just integrate dev ops with your git repo and you have your choice between ado pipelines and GitHub actions. GitHub vs Bitbucket vs GitLab: Which is the Best Version Control System for you? tekkiwebsolutions. io is Github and Bitbucket only. Gitea vs Gogs vs Gitlab support Hi, now i'm using gitea as my self-hosted git service and i want to know if i shoud switch to one of the alternatives or if they have extra features or better performance. Computer Programming Since GitLab will be reduced to five users my company decided to switch to another git platform. Members Online GitHub vs Bitbucket vs GitLab: Which is the Best Version Control System for you? I have been using Gitlab but was considering Bitbucket almost exclusively because of Jira out of the box. Just don't forget to invite all 2M subscribers in the webdev community. For more design-related GitHub vs. All members should know what the others are doing and freely access code written by their colleagues. Now, it's partly because we use a bunch of other Atlassian products (e. Waffle. Here's a comprehensive comparison to help you make an informed decision. However, this also means that we want to move our CICD pipelines. bitbucket if you're already using jira & confluence and NOT github gitlab if you don't have already have a ticketing & pr mechanism setup and still NOT using github neither if you're using github In the end, the choice between GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket will depend on your project's needs and your team's preferences. Bitbucket and GitLab are two popular options, each with its unique features and benefits. kkxs cezfdti xndakp lzq fosckj bmdic aoyd oob presuffs rjtr